I'm not advocating for a ban of all things proprietary, I'm just saying we shouldn't stray too much from libre.
And again: The term "Creative Commons" is not synonymous with free/libre because of e.g. CC BY-NC and CC BY-ND (these are completely at odds with free software, free culture AND open source values). Only CC0, CC BY and CC BY-SA are libre. Even Creative Commons admits that -NC and -ND do not count as free cultural works.
But yeah I agree sometimes when a significant part of the game is libre, that's not a reason for a ban. Especially when moving towards 100% libre is a long-term goal. I strongly support the idea of using this forum to help (currently proprietary) game projects to replace proprietary files; in fact, it has happened before.
With "abuse" I meant obvious bad-faith actors who knowingly lie about a game being FOSS when it's not, when they deliberately misinterpret FOSS, when they are trigger-happy with copyright lawsuits. For now, this is mostly a theoretical concern.
I still dislike the tag because regardless of the intention, the lack of the tag can be interpreted by people to imply being non-free.
But if the libre tag is not going away, I might as well use it. I request to add it to this thread then: Repixture
(it seems I cannot change tags after posting the thread)
License info: https://codeberg.org/Wuzzy/Repixture/src/branch/master/README.md
and replacement engines form a significant part of open-source gaming.
True!